Columnist Suzanna Danuta Walters, writing an opinion-editorial in the Washington Post asked the age-old feminist question: “Why can’t we hate men?” accompanied by a photo of alleged rapist Harvey Weinstein as the (morbidly obese) male archetype.
Of course, her irrational hatred goes back much farther than Handsy Harvey. (Louder With Crowder)
It’s not that Eric Schneiderman (the now-former New York attorney general accused of abuse by multiple women) pushed me over the edge. My edge has been crossed for a long time, before President Trump, before Harvey Weinstein, before “mansplaining” and “incels.” Before live-streaming sexual assaults and red pill men’s groups and rape camps as a tool of war and the deadening banality of male prerogative.
Seen in this indisputably true context, it seems logical to hate men. I can’t lie, I’ve always had a soft spot for the radical feminist smackdown, for naming the problem in no uncertain terms. I’ve rankled at the “but we don’t hate men” protestations of generations of would-be feminists and found the “men are not the problem, this system is” obfuscation too precious by half.
At least Walters is honest. However, the broad brush strokes she’s admittedly using to condemn an entire gender and justify her bigotry is insane. How the Washington Post can enable her radical views by printing such nonsense is absurd, even if it is a liberal publication.
Read more at American Action News