A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by more than 100 Houston, TX hospital workers who objected to a mandate to take a COVID-19 vaccine or risk being fired. Houston Methodist Hospital which owns and operates eight hospitals in the area told employees they had until June 7th to receive the vaccine or they would be suspended or fired.
Last week, the HMH suspended more than 150 employees without pay. However, 117 employees filed a lawsuit against the mandate alleging the vaccine is “experimental and dangerous” which U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes of Houston ruled was false.
According to The Daily Wire:
“Bridges can freely choose to accept or refuse a COVID-19 vaccine; however, if she refuses, she will simply need to work somewhere else,” Hughes wrote.
“If a worker refuses an assignment, changed office, earlier start time, or other directive, he may be properly fired. Every employment includes limits on the worker’s behavior in exchange for remuneration. That is all part of the bargain,” the judge said.
The plaintiffs’ lawyer, Jared Woodfill, disagreed and vowed to file an appeal. “All of my clients continue to be committed to fighting this unjust policy,” Woodfill said in a statement.
“What is shocking is that many of my clients were on the front line treating COVID-positive patients at Texas Methodist Hospital during the height of the pandemic. As a result, many of them contracted COVID-19. As a thank you for their service and sacrifice, Methodist Hospital awards them a pink slip and sentences them to bankruptcy,” Woodfill said.
The plaintiffs noted that the hospital is requiring employees to receive a vaccine that hasn’t been fully approved by the FDA and also cited the Nuremberg Code, which “bans forced medical experimentations, again in effect arguing that the vaccine is experimental and potentially unsafe.”
If anyone desires to understand why the mRNA vaccines are TOXIC (spike protein) and especially dangerous, you must listen to the following 3-hour podcast, broadcasted last Friday:
Well established International law and medical ethics dating back to WWII protects us from medical procedures against our will. The judge is completely wrong. It is a violation of our rights for government or employers to force any person to have a medical procedure against their will.
It is time to put our foot down America otherwise what will the control freaks force us to do next
This ruling is wrong on so many levels. Altering or “limiting” one’s “behavior” for employment purposes does not include altering your biological functions or risking long-term health consequences or worse–death from unapproved vaccines. You would think that these Methodist hospitals, being command centers for squads of the medical elite, would understand that if you have already contracted the CCP virus the vaccine serves no purpose. Obviously, this is totally political. The Methodist medical system is corrupt and holds a great deal of political influence, and likely influence over this Judge. This is the same medical system that promotes water fluoridation, another dangerous assault on our health!
Indeed it IS totally political. We fear the long-term effects of this upstart vaccine which is not like our legacy vaccines, not approved by FDA (studies are incomplete), its manufacturers are shielded from lawsuits should anyone suffer severe and adverse reactions. And this Trojan Horse vaccine against a virus which CDC itself now reveals in >99% survivable? Adverse vaccine reactions are being minimized or not at all reported and moreover, the positive effects of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have been swept under the rug. The Left has subsumed medicine. Conscientious physicians are being silenced. What’s going on? 1. The pandemic was maximized as a political weapon to seize control of our nation; 2. Follow the money: some folks, likely Dr. Falsie among them, are reaping megabucks $$$$$ from our lapse in public health. We live in dark times.
The judge thinks an employer telling workers to be at work an hour earlier or lose their job is the same as forcing employees to take some material into their bodies. What the hell is wrong with that judge?
If you go to work naked will you be fired?
If a business of any sort requires a mask of employees or visitors to their establishment that is their right.
Welcome to the Peoples Republic of America.