Via Peter Roff, AAN:

Washington, D.C. — Dr. Anthony Fauci, the man many consider to be the public face of the U.S. government’s fight against the COVID virus, now stands accused of violating a federal law prohibiting certain government employees from engaging in activities and making statements intended to influence the electorate.

Protect the Public’s Trust, a government watchdog organization, said in a June 30 filing that Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, ran afoul of Hatch Act restrictions during an October 30, 2020 interview with The Washington Post in which he “intimated that the state of the nation’s public health outlook could be directly linked to the two candidates’ diverse approaches” to combating the spread of the novel coronavirus.

The virus, which some allege was created in a bacteriological research facility in the People’s Republic of China, spread rapidly around the world and is believed to be responsible for the death of more than 600,000 people in the United States alone. A recent Rasmussen Reports national survey of registered voters found 46 percent did not believe Fauci had not been truthful about U.S. financial support for the “gain of function” research — defined as “taking a virus that could infect humans and making it either more transmissible and/or pathogenic for humans”  — conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Kentucky GOP Sen. Rand Paul, who is also a physician and has aggressively called for a full investigation into the origins of COVID has said repeatedly that emails sent and received by Fauci and uncovered by a Freedom of Information Act request show that Fauci was aware American taxpayer-funded grants were at least partially underwriting the Wuhan lab’s research that may have produced the virus.

Asked by The Post about the differences between the plans of the two 2020 presidential candidates for dealing with the pandemic, Fauci praised then-former Vice President Joe Biden for “taking it seriously from a public health perspective” while stating simply that President Donald J. Trump was “looking at it from a different perspective.”

The group’s complaint also singles out Fauci’s call for an “abrupt change” just days before voters headed to the polls. It could be inferred from his remark that he was advocating for Biden to replace Trump in the White House though, in the context of the interview it appears he was talking about the national strategy for stopping the spread of COVID.

The collection of issues related to COVID has a major impact on the 2020 election. They were, Protect the Public’s Trust recently wrote, a “paramount concern for voters entering the 2020 general election.” An August 2020 pre-election Pew Research poll cited by the group found, “62 percent of voters say[ing] the outbreak will be a very important factor in their decision about who to support in the fall.”

Post-election surveys as well as Trump’s own campaign team’s analysis explaining why he lost suggest strongly the public’s perception he’d mishandled the pandemic drove many voters — even some who typically vote GOP — to cast their ballots for Biden.

“The timing of (Fauci’s) statements, combined with the circumstances of the interview and post-election comments celebrating the outcome,” The Federalist wrote about the complaint when it broke the story in June, “illustrate further intent in Fauci’s remarks that violate the Hatch Act.”

The election, The Federalist pointed out, was decided by less than 43,000 votes across what it called “three tipping-point states” despite Biden’s popular vote total having exceeding trump’s by more than 7 million. The narrowness of the actual result could, some election professionals say, be interpreted as lending support to the argument made by the watchdog group that Fauci’s remarks assisted Biden politically even though that would be hard to prove.

The federal Hatch Act dates back to the New Deal period and is the result of allegations some connected to the administration of President Franklin D. Roosevelt had played politics with funds intended to alleviate the economic impact of the Great Depression to the benefit of local Democratic Party political machines. In its current form, it also prohibits members of the federal government’s Senior Executive Service – of which Fauci is part – from engaging in political activity while on duty and from using their official authority to interfere with an election.

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AmericanActionNews.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kathy
kathy
2 years ago

He is complicit as the day is long….sorry he is a fraud in my eyes…

JOHN Swarbrick
JOHN Swarbrick
2 years ago

was john kerry guilty of the hatch act also?

kathy
kathy
2 years ago

I have said from the begin that Fauci was involved in this… maybe indirectly but still complicit, the NIH has been funding the Wuhan lab for years and found e-mails show the extent of his knowledge of gain of function testing…prosecute is all i have to say… he may well be complicit in over a half of million deaths in the US alone… not to mention the loss of many businesses, all while he makes another fortune in masks…

Bobby
Bobby
2 years ago

Fauci should be criminal charged for deceiving an dishonesty with knowing about covid19. Do not sweep this under the rug.

krtinec
krtinec
2 years ago

Fauci, simple way to say is crooked idiot.

trackback
passive income investments
11 months ago

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More to that Topic: thehollywoodconservative.us/articles/fauci-hit-with-hatch-act-complaint/ […]

trackback
DevOps Consultant Agency
11 months ago

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: thehollywoodconservative.us/articles/fauci-hit-with-hatch-act-complaint/ […]

trackback
OBIDATTI
11 months ago

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More to that Topic: thehollywoodconservative.us/articles/fauci-hit-with-hatch-act-complaint/ […]