U.S. Department of Agriculture, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Via TTN:

Musk’s plan to clean up Twitter can’t come soon enough.

In a shockingly brazen display of the left’s depravity, a former reporter pondered whether assassinating senior Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito would save Roe v. Wade.

The Daily Wire reports:

“Interesting real life trolley problem in America now,” tweeted Simon Gwynn, whose public profiles say that he worked for Haymarket Media Group as a journalist before he reportedly resigned over “unwise” tweets. “If you had the chance to kill Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, the two oldest right wing Supreme Court judges, should you do it while Biden can get his nominees to replace them confirmed?”

“It’s interesting as an abstract question but becomes a real conundrum if, say, you’re terminally ill and have little to lose yourself, but know that it could save many women’s lives in the future,” Gwynn continued.

It wasn’t long before the tweets were deleted from Gwynn’s account however multiple accounts were able to screenshot the former reporter’s disturbing messages.

“I’ve removed my recent two tweets about the US Supreme Court as on reflection they’re obviously pretty irresponsible, though I don’t think they would be against Twitter’s TOS,” Gwynn said on Thursday morning. “FYI I don’t endorse murdering anyone, but don’t think there’s anything wrong with thought experiments.”

Gwynn’s tweets also come as liberal activist groups have called to protest outside of Supreme Court justice’s homes in hoping to intimidate a ruling.

Progressive group Ruth Sent Us announced “walk-by Wednesday” for May 11, urging protestors to come to “the homes of the six extremist justices, three in Virginia and three in Maryland.”

“The radical Left and their dark money funders have one goal, which is to intimidate the Court,” Judicial Crisis Network President Carrie Severino told The Daily Wire on Wednesday evening. “Showing up at the justices’ homes to harass them is absolutely beyond the pale and shows the lengths to which they are willing to go in order to undermine the Court’s independence.”

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James R Maxwell
James R Maxwell
4 months ago

If ROW Vs WADE is overturned, as it should be, then each State and it politicians will have to assume
the mantle of deciding the fate of the unborn and bear the scorn and fate that befalls them. It never
should have been decided by the Supreme Court as it is a STATES RIGHTS issue and always has been..
The primary reason the Democrat Socialist want it to continue is because they do not have to stand
and be counted when elections roll around each year and people will use that to remove those who
want to MURDER UNBORN CHILDREN. They will have to stand and pass State Law that permits
the murder of Children and that could cause them to lose their office and fat paycheks.

Oirish1953
Oirish1953
4 months ago

This person’s comments are not free speech they are veiled threats and should be punished. The leftist media is completely corrupt and biased. If a conservative made such a veiled threat against Bozo Biden or Harris they would be demanding execution.

Ecks Mann
Ecks Mann
4 months ago
Reply to  Oirish1953

Those responsible for releasing judges addresses should be charged as accessory to any crime committed to any judge or property.

Car
Car
4 months ago

She is asking terminally ill people to murder 2 on the Supreme Court? Why isn’t she arrested?

Brady
4 months ago
Reply to  Car

Demos don’t go to jail, they just keep running their lip, till somebody knocks them on their a–. The common-sense people are getting real tired of these yaloos.

ReagansBlades
ReagansBlades
4 months ago

I don’t see him in bracelets yet, do you?

Last edited 4 months ago by ReagansBlades
Brady
4 months ago

The Democrat way of saying something, then taking it back. And you say he is an x reporter or a run of the mill demo?

Gene Ralno
Gene Ralno
4 months ago

Any fool who publicly suggests that someone might be near death and willing to commit murder should be ostracized by any media with circulation of more than one. We all now know about one such fool. It might be tantamount to an exception to the 1st Amendment that forbids screaming fire in a crowded theater.

Many half-baked zealots have been motivated by today’s hysterical brand of politics and might be willing to violently harm others for a cause, e.g., BLM and Antifa. Often, these and other maladjusted souls have nothing better to do than seek their fame in the spotlight. The solution is fewer entitlements, more law enforcement, smaller government and more free enterprise.

Sounds corny but the freedom of speech and press balances itself peacefully if allowed to present facts. When one media group dominates at the expense of the public, government exists to settle problems created by unmoderated bias. Currently, government is the source of most bias and voters are required to balance it. I could go on.

JOE BIDEN
JOE BIDEN
4 months ago

What the hell has happened to America?
America is choking on it’s own vomit!

Ecks Mann
Ecks Mann
4 months ago

He doesn’t see anything wrong with the “thought experiment”? He won’t mind if some equally nut case as him but without moral restraint decides HIS idea is a good idea? Or maybe THAT is the idea.
He needs to be charged with voicing a threat, instigating violence against officers of the court, spend a few months in jail and pay a hefty fine. When a few of these types morons get the application of REAL justice, that sort of garbage would stop.

Mikey
Mikey
3 months ago

Wow, I smell threats and insurrection. When is the Congress going to set up hearings on this?

Hello?