The Biden administration, in recent policy shifts, has presented two notable declarations. The forgiveness of $39 billion in student loan debt, and the authorization to send up to 3,000 U.S. reserve troops to Ukraine, are actions that have stirred up significant debate among both supporters and critics.
In a move perceived by some as a limited approach to a widespread issue, the administration has chosen to discharge federal student loans for over 800,000 borrowers. This will apply to those who have made qualifying monthly payments for 20 or 25 years, contingent on their repayment plan and loan type. While Education Secretary Miguel Cardona argues that this is an attempt to rectify previous administrative shortcomings and create a fairer higher education system, critics argue that this initiative does not adequately address the root of the problem. The escalating costs of college tuition and fees, largely unaddressed in this initiative, have resulted in an expanding student loan crisis.
Interestingly, the student loan forgiveness program follows a Supreme Court ruling rejecting the administration’s broader proposal to cancel student loan debt. It appears as though the proposed relief for borrowers earning less than $125,000 per year is temporarily sidelined, leaving a significant demographic without the relief they may have expected. As such, questions arise about whether the administration is doing enough to ensure the affordability of higher education for all Americans.
On the international stage, President Biden’s decision to authorize the activation of up to 3,000 U.S. reserve troops for deployment in Ukraine is also not without controversy. Lt. Gen. Douglas Sims insists that this move demonstrates unwavering support for NATO’s defense against Russian aggression in Ukraine. But one can’t help but wonder if this action is potentially escalating the tension in an already volatile region.
President Biden’s recent European tour, where he visited the U.K., Lithuania, and Finland, raises questions about the timing of this troop deployment. Has sufficient diplomatic effort been made to quell the aggression without resorting to military involvement? And while assurances have been given to Ukraine about their long-term security under existing NATO agreements, the fact remains that Ukraine’s path to NATO membership remains uncertain.
President Zelenskyy of Ukraine has been diplomatic in his response to this arrangement, but it’s unclear whether this measure truly serves Ukraine’s best interests. There is a concern that the deployment of U.S. troops may exacerbate the very tensions it seeks to alleviate.
Ty, ty bro nice pst.
I was somewhat fortunate in that I received a veterans subsidy for my college education, but had to pay my own housing, food, books and all other expenses!!! I truly believe everyone who wants a college education MUST Pay Their Own Way, Not at Taxpayer Expense!!!!
Sending Taxpayer money, Weapons and now 3,000 soldiers to Ukraine at tax pay expense and further jeopardizing America’s military recourses is unwarranted!!! The neighboring countries to Ukraine should step up in defense of Ukraine, as they will likely be Russia’s next target!!!!
WE DONT Need 3K troops in Ukraine
NO they want our Tech
[…] Source: Biden Enacts Two Disastrous Policies Within 24 Hours – The Hollywood Conservative […]
The Biden Administration`s support of Ukraine strangely resembles the way we blundered into Viet Nam only this time we are risking WWIII. This current Administration is very dangerous because of their ignorance and incompetence.